Revised to amine-based solvent systems: an integrated review with a focus on CESAR-1
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions are widely recognized as meaningful contributors to climate change and global warming. Technologies of various kinds have been proposed to address this issue, and among them, amine-based solvents are widely utilized. However, monoethanolamine (MEA), the prototypical amine-based solvent, exhibits critical limitations due to its relatively higher energy consumption compared to recent developments, as well as corrosion, degradation, and carcinogenic byproducts. CESAR-1, a mixture of AMP (2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol) and PZ (piperazine), is consequently proposed as an alternative solution. This paper presents a comparative analysis of MEA, MDEA, and CESAR-1 while highlighting their structural properties, reaction pathways, CO₂ absorption capacity, regeneration energy requirements, and by-product formation. Previous research had compiled CO₂ reaction pathways and outcomes for each solvent under varying conditions, encompassing reaction of both absorption and regeneration, and by-product formation. MEA has been commercially used and can operate continuously for over 4,000 hours, as demonstrated in numerous studies. Continuous operation enabled these studies to yield highly reliable results. However, MEA has high energy consumption, which significantly increases operating costs. In other words, it greatly reduces efficiency. Based on a comprehensive review of the materials provided, CESAR-1 is particularly noteworthy because of its synergistic strengths of AMP and PZ, which somewhat negate the disadvantage of MEA. Nevertheless, drawbacks remain in CESAR-1; hence, we proposed an alternative by introducing Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). SCR may be a suitable strategy for reducing the formation of nitrosamines during the process. However, as NO and NO₂ pose greater environmental and health risks than CO₂, further studies are required to determine which by-products emitted from the entire process are not hazardous to the environment.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Selective Catalytic Reduction | How it works. Tersus Diesel Exhaust Fluid. https://www.tersusdef.com/about/how-selective-catalytic-reduction-scr-works/.
[2] Yadav, S.; Mondal, S. S. A Review on the Progress and Prospects of Oxy-Fuel Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) Technology. Fuel 2022, 308, 122057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122057.
[3] Gulzar, A.; Gulzar, A.; Ansari, M. B.; He, F.; Gai, S.; Yang, P. Carbon Dioxide Utilization: A Paradigm Shift with CO2 Economy. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances 2020, 3, 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100013.
[4] Morlando, D.; Buvik, V.; Delic, A.; Hartono, A.; Svendsen, H. F.; Kvamsdal, H. M.; da Silva, E. F.; Knuutila, H. K. Available Data and Knowledge Gaps of the CESAR1 Solvent System. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2024, 13, 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100290.
[5] Moser, P.; Wiechers, G.; Schmidt, S.; Stahl, K.; Garcia Moretz-Sohn Monteiro, J.; Veronezi Figueiredo, R.; Skylogianni, E. Degradation of the AMP/PZ-Based Solvent CESAR1 and Effects of Solvent Management in Two Longtime Pilot Plant Tests. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 499, 155928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155928.
[6] Forzatti, P. Present Status and Perspectives in De-NOx SCR Catalysis. Applied Catalysis A: General 2001, 222 (1-2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(01)00832-8.
[7] Ros, J.; Agon, N.; Louwagie, D.; Oriol Gutiérrez-Sanchez; Huizinga, A.; Gravesteijn, P.; Kruijne, M.; Eirini Skylogianni; Os, P. van; Garcia, J. CESAR1 Carbon Capture Pilot Campaigns at an Industrial Metal Recycling Site and Analysis of Solvent Degradation Behavior. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03998.
[8] Gibbins, J.; Elliott, B. In Amine Selection, Lower Energy Requirements and Lower Uncontrolled Degradation Rates Don’t Automatically Mean Lower Overall Costs – Implications for CESAR1 vs. MEA. SSRN Electronic Journal 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5071126.
[9] Campbell, matthew; Akhter, S.; Knarvik, A.; Muhammad, Z.; Wakaa, A. CESAR1 Solvent Degradation and Thermal Reclaiming Results from TCM Testing. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4286150.
[10] Yamada, H. Amine-Based Capture of CO2 for Utilization and Storage. Polymer Journal 2020, 53 (1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-00400-y.
[11] Moser, P.; Wiechers, G.; Stahl, K.; Schmidt, S. Stressing the AMP/PZ-Based Solvent CESAR1─Pilot Plant Testing on the Effect of O2, NO2, and Regeneration Temperature on Solvent Degradation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2025, 64 (7), 4001–4013. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04285.
[12] Li, L.; Yu, H.; Puxty, G.; Zhou, S.; Conway, W.; Feron, P. Integrated CO₂ Capture and Mineralization Based on Monoethanolamine and Lime Kiln Dust. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63 (36), 16019–16028. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02064.
[13] Dutcher, B.; Fan, M.; Russell, A. G. Amine-Based CO2 Capture Technology Development from the Beginning of 2013—A Review. Chemosphere 2015, 138, 2137–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.082
[14] Li, L.; Yu, H.; Ji, L.; Zhou, S.; Dao, V.; Feron, P.; Benhelal, E. Integrated CO2 Capture and Mineralization Approach Based on KOH and Cement-Based Wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 456, 14055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14055
[15] Collins, M.; Pan, L.; Ponce-Rodriguez, R.; Wang, S. Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage Adoption in Steelmaking. SSRN Electron. J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4276820
[16] World Ocean Review 1: Ocean Chemistry - CO2 Reservoir. 2010. https://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-1/ocean-chemistry/co2-reservoir/
[17] Shadab, F.; Alkhatib, I. I. I.; Vega, L. F. Guiding the Selection of Novel Amines for CO₂ Capture Using a Molecular-Based and Multicriteria Modeling Approach. Energy & Fuels 2024, 38 (18), 17805–17821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03210.
[18] Yadav, Sujeet, and S.S. Mondal. “A Review on the Progress and Prospects of Oxy-Fuel Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) Technology.” Fuel, vol. 308, Jan. 2022, p. 122057, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122057.
[19] Morgan, J. C.; Campbell, M.; Putta, K. R.; Shah, M. I.; Matuszewski, M.; Omell, B. Development of Process Model of CESAR1 Solvent System and Validation with Large Pilot Data. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-16), Lyon, France, Oct 23–27, 2022.