Mobility Models as a Key-Performance Factor for Wireless Networks

Main Article Content

Ayad Hussain Abdulqader

Abstract

Nodes in wireless networks can be static or dynamic. Static nodes are stationary and their positions are fixed and their distribution may follow a particular topology. On the other hand, dynamic nodes are considered mobile and their positions changed over time due to following a specific pattern of movement, which also lead to the concept of the topology being irrelated. Simulating such networks needs a lot of attention and many requirements should be held. For instance, nodes in dynamic wireless networks are distributed according to a distribution that reflects the nature of the environment (e.g., Gaussian, Power-Law, Uniform distribution, etc.). Moreover, describing the movement patterns of nodes in dynamic wireless networks need to follow a particular mobility model that describes the movements of nodes in terms of speed and direction (e.g., Individual mobility model, Levy Flight Model, Cauchy Model). In addition to the aforementioned requirements, it is needed to incorporate a routing protocol that governs data spread within the simulation environment. This work designed a variety of experiments that combine the mentioned requirements and measure the performance of dynamic wireless networks under colorful settings and configurations. The metrics used in this approach are the amount of data exchanged, coverage area, and power and memory consumption.  Mobility models, node deployment strategy (distributions), and routing protocols are the three factors that will be involved in the experiments. The experiments deal with four mobility models Random Way Point Mobility Model (RWPM), Street Random Way Point Mobility Model (SRWPM), Manhattan Mobility Model (MM), and Levy Flight Mobility Model (LFM). Three distribution models will be used in the experiments Power-Law Distribution, Chi-Squared Distribution, and Normal Distribution. The third factor that will be involved in the routing protocol, is Probabilistic Flooding Routing Protocol. Different experiments are benchmarked using these metrics. The results of this work will reveal facts about dynamic network simulations and provide some recommendations to network developers and architects.


Article Details

How to Cite
Abdulqader, A. (2022). Mobility Models as a Key-Performance Factor for Wireless Networks. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(5), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i5.6668
Section
Articles

References

Raychaudhuri, D., & Gerla, M. (Eds.). (2011). Emerging wireless technologies and the future mobile internet. Cambridge University Press.

Althunibat, S., Badarneh, O. S., & Mesleh, R. (2019). Random waypoint mobility model in space modulation systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 23(5), 884-887.

Kraaier, J., & Killat, U. (2005, September). -The random waypoint city model- user distribution in a street-based mobility model for wireless network simulations. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots (pp. 100-103).

Ramakrishan, B., Joe, M. M., & Nishanth, R. B. (2014). Modeling and simulation of efficient cluster based Manhattan Mobility model for Vehicular communication. Journal of emerging technologies in web intelligence, 6(2), 253-261.

Emami, H., & Alipour, M. M. (2021). Chaotic local search-based levy flight distribution algorithm for optimizing ONU placement in fiber-wireless access network. Optical Fiber Technology, 67, 102733.

Mahmood, B. M., & Dabdawb, M. M. (2020). The pandemic COVID-19 infection spreading spatial aspects: A network-Based software approach. AL-Rafidain Journal of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, 14(1), 159-170.

Jindal, A., & Psounis, K. (2006, July). Performance analysis of epidemic routing under contention. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing (pp. 539-544).

Yassein, M. B., & Khaoua, M. O. (2007). Applications of probabilistic flooding in MANETs. Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Journal, 1, 1-5.

Spyropoulos, T., Psounis, K., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2005, August). Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking (pp. 252-259).

Tomasini, M., Mahmood, B., Zambonelli, F., Brayner, A., & Menezes, R. (2017). On the effect of human mobility to the design of metropolitan mobile opportunistic networks of sensors. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 38, 215-232.

Mahmood, B., & Menezes, R. (2016). The role of human relations and interactions in designing memory-related models for sensor networks. Sensors & Transducers, 199(4), 42-51.

Hernández-Orallo, E., & Armero-Martínez, A. (2020). How human mobility models can help to deal with covid-19. Electronics, 10(1), 33.

Wei, Y., Wang, J., Song, W., Xiu, C., Ma, L., & Pei, T. (2021). Spread of COVID-19 in China: analysis from a city-based epidemic and mobility model. Cities, 110, 103010.

Mahmood, B. (2021, July). Indicators on the Feasibility of Curfew on Pandemics Outbreaks in Metropolitan/Micropolitan Cities. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT) (pp. 179-183). IEEE.

Manzira, C. K., Charly, A., & Caulfield, B. (2022). Assessing the impact of mobility on the incidence of COVID-19 in Dublin City. Sustainable Cities and Society, 80, 103770.