Radiation Safety Awareness and Practice among Radiology Staff in Kabul National Specialty Hospitals
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the world, more than ten million photographs and hundreds of thousands of nuclear medicine operations are performed daily. The exposure of such a large population even at the low dose levels used in diagnostic radiology due to definite effects and the possibility of ionizing radiation has caused public concern. This study aimed to determine the awareness of radiology staff from X-Rays adverse effects and the extent of use of safety measures in their practice in Kabul National hospitals. Methodology: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 60 radiology staff in national specialty hospitals of Kabul Afghanistan. A structured multiple-choice questionnaire was used. Data were coded and analyzed using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) software. Results: 83.3% of participants were male. 71% of the participants had >40 years old and the mean age of them was 41 years old. The type of job of participants was radiology technician. The mean of the years of job experience was 16 years. The knowledge or awareness of 95.0 % of participants was weak and 5.0% was intermediate. 96.7% of participant's practice was good and 3.3 % was intermediate. Conclusion: The level of awareness of 95.0 % of radiology staff was very poor. This is of concern as technologists are the first point of contact with the patients and they should be adequately trained to answer common patient questions and concerns. The level of practice of 3.3 % of the staff was intermediate and 96.7% was good. Based on our results, a conscientious effort to provide a more robust education and acquire greater knowledge in these matters is required.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Arslanoglu A, Bilgin S, Kubal Z, Ceyhan MN, Ilhan MN, Maral I (2007) Doctors’ and intern doctors’ knowledge about patients’ ionizing radiation exposure doses during common radiological examinations. Diagn Interv Radiol 13(2):53–55.
Azmoonfar R, Faghirnavaz H, Younesi H, et al. 2016.Physicians' knowledge about radiation dose in the radiological investigation in Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng; 6(4): 285–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2071–2077.
Borgen L, Stranden E (2014) Radiation knowledge and perception of referral practice among radiologists and radiographers compared with referring clinicians. Insights Imaging 28:28.
Brenner DJ.2010. Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage. Rev Environ Health; 25(1): 63–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gunalp M, Gulunay B, Polat O et al (2013) Ionising radiation awareness among resident doctors, interns, and radiographers in a university hospital emergency department. Radiol Med 20:20
Huang B, Law MW, Khong PL (2009) Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 251(1):166–174.
Keijzers GB, Britton CJ (2010) Doctors’ knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department. Med J Aust 193(8):450–453.
Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231(2):393–398.
Lee RK, Chu WC, Graham CA, Rainer TH, Ahuja AT (2012) Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological investigations: a comparison between radiologists and non-radiologists. Emerg Med J 29(4):306–308.
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCPR). NCRP report no. 160. Bethesda, MD: NCRP, https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report-160-2/ (accessed 23 June 2018). [Google Scholar]
Schauer DA, Linton OW (2009) NCRP Report No. 160, ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure—are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys 97(1):1–5